« Reactions to the Record II | Main | YEEEEAAAAHHHHHHHEEEYYYYYYYYY! »

January 21, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451e57669e2010536e13bbf970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Air/Simple Gifts:

Comments

David Bratman

Alex Ross noted the congruence with Messiaen's ensemble back when the announcement was first made. I later mentioned it to a friend who responded that Williams's piece should have been titled Quatuor pour la fin du Bush.

Brian H.

In the NY Times piece on Gill that ran earlier this week it said Ma met Gill eight years ago when they were playing the Quartet for the End of Time together in Japan. "[Mr. Ma] noted that the group consisted of the same instrumentation as the Messiaen piece. The Williams work, however, “will be more like ‘Quartet for the Next Four Minutes,’” he said."

I agree that the piece worked beautifully for the occasion but felt the slow, meandering intro was not the best for "the venue" and probably lost most of the audience right away (2 million people outdoors, I would have opened with more of a punch).

David Cavlovic

But with all due respect, Williams is no Messiaen.

Phil Ford

I was listening to this on internet radio, so the visual aspect was lost on me. Actually, the slow quiet introduction worked very well in this audio-only setting (for me, at least) -- it sounded like a frail sweet voice in danger of being carried away on the wind that was battering the microphone. When the "Simple Gifts" part began it seemed as if that voice was gaining in strength and assurance -- a rather nice musical metaphor for the moment. It was at this point that the radio announcers decided to treat a musical interlude as dead air and started talking, thus ruining the effect. Funny, they didn't talk over Rick Warren's invocation.

rootlesscosmo

The Hindemith Clarinet Quartet (1938) uses the same instrumentation and is a good piece, but I guess if we weren't going to get Messiaen we definitely weren't going to get Hindemith.

David

I suspect the performance we heard was recorded, though I do not think it diminishes the event at all. A real outdoor performance in that weather would have been dicey, at best. I noted some inconsistencies between the music heard and some of Yo-yo Ma's bowing, as well as a lack of dynamic difference the closer and farther away performers were from their mics. I could be completely wrong and either way I bear no ill-will over it.

My sentiment, of course, is in contrast to the full-court press against Williams I am reading across the arts web. Messiaen or Hindemith would have been a perfectly delightful message to artists––"trot out your strongest stuff, folks, and we'll celebrate and/or pay you for it"––but the wrong message for the millions watching (the "unwashed," to use a phrase I seem to hear a lot in music-academic circles). Obama has branded himself as the most accessible president in history, or at least a case-in-point on the accessibility of power in America, but the music of high modernists send the opposite message. It is surprising to hear the historiography and hermeneutics of a former era––even one that is now ancient history to a sitting president!––trotted out by "Experts" as the normative arts philosophy of America. It should be no surprise to us that the music was accessible: such an assessment is an effective interpretive framework for the entire Obama message until now, to say nothing of the Coplandesque "common man" tropes.

But perhaps I am biased by the fact that, as the musicians were playing, I received a text message from my "unwashed" but appreciative father that said, simply: "Beautiful!" Not that I did or did not agree with him, but I think it is an audience response worth unpacking as significant and meaningful, not rejected out of hand.

Tying both of my points together, we should not be surprised that an inauguration was so highly constructed. The pre-recorded music (if it was indeed so) was an attempt to control the aesthetic message sent. Otherwise, we might have had the musical equivalent of the bungled oath. It is also worth asking, then, for whom was the Williams piece played: America's artists or a state ceremony's audience?

Lisa Hirsch

I dislike "Simple Gifts" (and Copland in Americana mode) and stopped listening when the piece got to that point.

D.L. MacLaughlan-Dumes

The quartet did not play it live; they mimed it:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/23/arts/music/23band.html?hp

Jonathan

I just read that, D. They ended up miming because of the cold, which is reasonable enough. What was it, fifteen degrees Fahrenheit or something?

D.L. MacLaughlan-Dumes

It was about 25 degrees during the performance, cold enough to warrant extra precautions, certainly.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment